The 5-Level Strategic Fluency Ladder
Most professionals plateau at strategic mediocrity without realizing it. Francis Wade reveals the five-level Strategic Fluency Ladder that separates executives who merely use strategy vocabulary from those who genuinely think strategically.
Ep 26 - Seth Godin - Stuck in Stale Strategy? Seeing Systems Which Hold You Back
Seth Excerpt
A Plan is Not a Strategy
In this masterclass from Harvard Business Review, Roger Martin—former dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto and one of the world's most influential strategic thinkers—delivers a crystal-clear explanation of why most organizations confuse planning with strategy, and why that confusion guarantees mediocrity.
The Rise and Fall of Blockbuster: How an $8b empire vanished
At its peak, Blockbuster Video had over 9,000 stores worldwide, serving 65 million customers a year and making hundreds of millions in profit from late fees alone. So… what happened to Blockbuster?
Comeback Stories
David vs. Goliath
Fresh Ideas
Big Mistakes
Winners vs. The Rest
MBA Refresh
Caribbean
Latest Movies
The 5-Level Strategic Fluency Ladder
Navigating Innovation and Creating an Invincible Company
Hard to Engage Staff on Vision/Strategy? In Your Sleep w/AI
The Commoncog Method Used by StratCinema
Seeing What's Next: Using Theories of Innovation to Predict
The Dawn and Dusk of Sun Microsystems
The New Long-Term Planning in the Caribbean
Why Strategy Documents Lack Insights
/ chriscfox | https://www.stratnavapp.com/
------- ⏱
Key Chapters: 00:00 - The Problem: Why Most Strategy Docs Are Useless
02:16 - The "Last Year + 10%" Trap (And How to Escape It)
07:38 - Why Brainstorming Alone Fails (And What to Do Instead)
12:45 - How Apple & Amazon Use Insights to Win
18:30 - The Role of AI in Modern Strategy (Beyond Just Automation)
25:10 - How to Build an "Insight Machine" in Your Company
32:50 - Case Study: Turning a Failing Strategy Into a Breakthrough
40:15 - Final Takeaways: How to Stay Ahead in Any Industry
The Rise and Sad Fall of Wang Labs
📉 The Rise and Tragic Fall of Wang Laboratories
Description
This video details the remarkable entrepreneurial journey and subsequent collapse of Wang Laboratories, founded by the brilliant Chinese immigrant engineer An Wang. The company rose to prominence on the strength of Wang's singular genius, from patenting core memory technology to successfully transitioning from calculators to pioneering word processing systems (WPS) and mini-computers in the 1970s. At its peak, Wang Labs was a Fortune 500 powerhouse, dominating the office automation market. However, the video attributes the company's downfall in the mid-1980s to two critical errors: An Wang's failure to recognize the importance of the IBM PC Revolution and his insistence on appointing his inexperienced son, Fred Wang, to run R&D and later the presidency. This combination of missed technological shifts and chaotic succession led to product delays, internal turmoil, massive financial losses, and ultimately, bankruptcy in 1992, just two years after An Wang's death.
5 Key Moments and Timestamps
-
0:04:39: The Invention of Core Memory - While working at Harvard, An Wang invented the foundational concept for magnetic core memory (an ancestor of RAM) by realizing data could be read and immediately rewritten. He received a patent for this, which he later sold to IBM in 1955 for a crucial $400,000–$500,000 ($4.4M–$5.5M today), providing the seed money to move from consulting to product development.
-
0:12:01: The Calculator Success and Pivot - Wang Labs' first major hit was the Wang 300 calculator (1966), which sold extremely well on Wall Street and helped the company go public in 1967. However, realizing microprocessors would soon commoditize the market, An Wang made the "incredibly ballsy decision" to pull out of the calculator market in 1971 to focus entirely on computers.
-
0:17:19: Dominance with Word Processing - After a failed initial attempt, Wang released the redesigned Wang Word Processing System (WPS) in 1976. It was an immediate hit due to its power, upgradability, and ease of use (ditching IBM's Selectric and using a CRT screen), quickly making Wang the world's largest supplier of CRT-based word processing systems by the late 1970s.
-
0:19:20: Reaching the Peak - In 1978, Wang launched a massive ad campaign, culminating in a Super Bowl ad directly attacking IBM, which boosted public awareness from 3% to 14%. Sales reached $1 billion in 1982 and $2 billion in 1984. An Wang's stake peaked at over $1.6 billion in 1984, making him the richest man in New England.
-
0:24:00: The Fatal Misjudgment - An Wang resisted the PC, believing it was a "dead end commodity" like the calculator. This led him to miss the IBM PC Revolution. Coupled with his decision to install his inexperienced son Fred Wang in critical leadership roles, the company was unable to put out competitive products, leading to a massive 66% quarterly profit decline in 1985 and the beginning of the end.
The Rise and Fall of Digital Equipment Corporation DEC
💻 The Rise and Fall of Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC)
Description
This video chronicles the rise and eventual collapse of Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC), a pioneering American technology company whose innovations underpin modern computing. Founded in 1957, DEC initially focused on affordable, interactive computing, directly challenging the mainframe dominance of the era. The company cemented its legacy in 1977 with the introduction of the VAX mini-computer, which popularized multi-user, multitasking operating systems, virtual memory, and networking—features now standard on all modern devices. At its peak, DEC was the second-largest computer company after IBM. However, the video argues that DEC's downfall in the 1990s was primarily caused by its failure to adapt to the industry's shift away from mini-computers and toward personal computers (PCs) and workstations. This strategic oversight, combined with financial losses, led to the eventual retirement of founder Ken Olsen, a failed last-ditch effort with the Alpha chip, and the company's acquisition by Compaq in 1998.
5 Key Moments and Timestamps
-
0:00:44: The Founding and Core Philosophy - Ken Olsen and Harlan Anderson founded DEC in 1957 after observing that students preferred interactive computing over slow batch processing. Their initial goal was to build small, affordable mini-computers that were more appealing to scientists and researchers than expensive mainframes.
-
0:01:52: The VAX Revolution - In 1977, DEC introduced the VAX line of mini-computers. The VAX and its VMS operating system were revolutionary, introducing features like 32-bit architecture, virtual memory, multi-user access, and networking—features that would become foundational to modern computing.
-
0:02:29: The Performance Benchmark - The VAX 11/780 (released in 1977) was a pivotal machine, being the first computer affordable enough for many businesses and schools and the first that could execute one million instructions per second (MIPS). It became the base standard for computer speed benchmarks for many years.
-
0:03:42: The Fatal Strategic Failure - In 1984, DEC ventured into the personal computing space with the Rainbow 100, but the effort was futile due to IBM's dominance. The video argues that this failure to gain a foothold in the rapidly growing PC market played a pivotal role in the company's eventual demise.
-
0:04:47: The Downward Spiral and Acquisition - As the industry shifted toward PCs and away from mainframes/mini-computers in the 1990s, DEC recorded its first quarterly loss since its inception. Following a string of financial failures and the retirement of Ken Olsen, DEC was acquired by Compaq in 1998, marking the end of the company.
Jump-Leap Long-Term Strategy Podcast
Recent Episode
Let’s imagine for a moment that you are a citizen or resident of the USA. You love the country and especially the vision of the founding fathers. However, you are distressed by the degree of the political divide. It has hijacked popular attention. People seem to hate each other. Is there a way to find inspiration beyond the current uncertainty? Can leaders possibly come together if only they took a long-term view of the country, and the world?

